Tuesday, December 15, 2009

THE BLUE DOGS - PART III

In my last Post (The Blue Dogs – Part II), I posed the following questions:

Does the Democratic Blue Dog Coalition in the United States House of Representatives, including Congressmen Travis Childers (MS-1) and Gene Taylor (MS-4), serve some legitimate purpose that is good for America?

Do the Blue Dogs, regardless of their claim that they are for lowering the national debt, simply “facilitate” the activities of their extremely liberal Democrat Leaders in the House of Representatives, allow those leaders to hold on to power in the Congress, and also allow them to continue their reckless onslaught on the American Free Enterprise System ( in the same sense that a person who continues to make drinks available to a known alcoholic “facilitates” the alcoholic’s dependence on liquor)?

Do the Blue Dogs really serve as a check against their national Democrat leaders, such as Speaker Nancy Pelosi, or do we have the Blue Dogs to thank for the present liberal array of House of Representatives Committee Chairmen that are dedicated to a massive restructuring of our federal government and increased government control of our daily lives?

In considering these questions, we must first define a few terms. According to WEBSTER’S NEW WORLD DICTIONARY (Second College Ed.), the term “facilitate” is defined as “to make easy or easier”. The term “facilitation” means “increased ease of performance of any action”; and a “faciliter” is one that makes another’s job or performance easier.” On the other hand, one who is in “complicity” with another, according to WEBSTER, is a “participant”, or “in partnership in wrongdoing”.

Based on a casual glance at the website of THE BLUEDOG COALITION, its leaders proudly boast that the coalition has injected a “moderate” viewpoint into the Democratic Caucus in the United States House of Representatives; and that since 1996, “24 Blue Dogs won their seats by defeating a Republican incumbent.” There is no doubt that the efforts of populist Democrats to unseat conservative Republicans in diverse Congressional Districts have hurt the efforts of The Republican Party to maintain working control of the House of Representatives, but there is little evidence, if any, to show that the Blue Dog Democrats have had any significant effect on the liberal agenda of their Party. Instead, the evidence is crystal clear that these Blue Dogs have done little more for their country than to cast their votes for Nancy Pelosi for Speaker of the House of Representatives. They are then routinely ignored by their Party leaders unless their votes are needed in close party-line votes to support the agenda of the Speaker, although some have been effective in bringing home large amounts of “pork” for their Congressional Districts, thereby ironically increasing the national debt.

Just as a “friends” or others often feed the habit or desires of one inflicted with the disease of alcoholism, the Blue Dog Democrats routinely feed the excessive desires and spending habits (and support the pacifist views) of their national Democrat leaders in Washington by continually voting to keep them in power in the Congress. Our mothers always told us that we are known by the company we keep. Travis Childers, Gene Taylor, and the other members of the Blue Dog Coalition keep company with Nancy Pelosi and her extremely liberal House Committee Chairmen, as well as with Joe Biden and Barack Obama. They should not be allowed to successfully talk the conservative talk at home in the 2010 congressional elections, when they vote to support their Party leaders who are trying to create a new world order and walk the liberal walk in Washington.

3 comments:

Tegerdine for Congress 2010 said...

Your article hits to the core of why we need to remove "Blue Dogs" from office and replace them with true conservatives. True principled leadership requires that one states their beliefs and associates with groups that share those beliefs. It is a contradiction, disingenuous at best, to say you are socially conservative (pro-life, pro-family, pro-gun), but then support progressive liberal leadership who's beliefs are in direct opposition to the principles you claim to standby. On one hand, Rep. Taylor can claim he is socially conservative, then defend his support for Pelosi, Frank, Murtha and other liberals on the other. I would prefer to have a representative with clean, consistent hands! We as voters cannot allow our representatives to use our votes to help "facilitate" their political games, nor can we be "complicit" in their wrong-doing by not demanding accountability for their obvious contradiction. There is nothing conservative in the modern Democratic Party and as long as we leave the Blue Dogs like Taylor and Childer in place, we will be the victims of a progressive liberal agenda that will continue to strip us of our liberty and prosperity. The solution lies with the voters, so let's solve this problem in 2010 with true conservative leadership that has not been bought and paid for by either party. We need fresh, new Republicans who are committed to conservative principles!

GEORGE DONALD said...

TEST

GEORGE DONALD said...

JIM ENJOY THE READ-KEEP IT UP

Search This Blog